Who is Adnan Oktar (Part II)
Harun Yahya, a.k.a. Adnan Oktar, a.k.a. Adnan Hoca. If you follow him in Turkish media you can easly learn that his name is mentioned all kind of infamy. Some of his infamy.
To Use Drug (Cocain)
He attempted to blackmail an actress who refused to have sex with him.
To have sex with his disciples and to take their photos while they were having sex. And blackmail if they wanted to leave cult. (Anal and Oral sex is free in clut. It s because of Harun Yahya says that Quran doesnt mention about it doesnt prohibit it.)
He is also accused to establish and lead a criminal organization.
He’s one mental sick who led a cult that practiced sex with minors as oral and anal
He attempted to blackmail an actress who refused to have sex with him.
After all of this infamy he disappeared for many years and suddenly he came to stage with a new name as Harun Yahya.
it is really hard to decide whether Adnan Oktar established an Islamic Creationist Cult or an Islamic Recreational Sex Cult!He is also accused to establish and lead a criminal organization.
It s because of 51-year-old Mr Oktar’s strong appeal to young women, it is really hard to decide whether Adnan Oktar established an Islamic Creationist Cult or an Islamic Recreational Sex Cult!
Harun Yahaya is charlatan and a dangerous man. Here’s some background of this great impostor:
He is a hunter of young people belonged to socially active and prominent families of Istanbul which had a high economic status.
He is considered the leading Muslim advocate of creationism; unlike the majority of Christian creationists he subscribes to Old Earth creationism. He is an anti-zionist and anti-mason which he sees as very interrelated movements, but he rejects allegations of anti-Semitism.
Shortly after the publication of Judaism and Freemasonry, Adnan Oktar was arrested and imprisoned. He was transferred to Bakırköy Mental Hospital and placed under observation. His mentality disease has been approved from five more official mental clinics.
In 1990, he founded the BAV (Bilim Araşırma Vakfı (Foundation for Scientific Research). They only translate American Evagelist Church Researches against evolution.
A number of academics were harassed, threatened and slandered in fliers that labeled them “communists, separatists and Maoists” for teaching evolution In 1999, six of the professors won a civil court case against BAV for defamation and were awarded $6,000 each. Today he uses still same strategy to frighten.
July 23, 2007 at 9:38 pm |
No one is going to believe the nonsense here. It is obvious that Adnan Oktar has been the target of many plots against him. And the reason is so obvious that there is no need to mention. If someone reveals the facts about freemasonry and then goes on to fight with materialism, then he has to face the attacks against him. He is a man of belief and his struggle against freemasonry, atheism and materialism is so strong that, the ones who cannot counter attack with their ideas, try to take him down from the scene by using slanders. You can try to slander him as much as you can. Now the whole world knows him with his ideas. You do whatever you can do, you will not achieve your aim. God is with him.
September 15, 2007 at 2:02 pm |
salam alaikum,
I am an ardent reader of your write ups and other publications and want to salute your sense of islamic patriotism,may Allah continue to bless and increase youn in knowledge.
Could you please clarify why you don`t quote the sayings of the prophet(saw)(Hadiths)?Is it true you intend to lay claim to prophethood?Ramadan kareem.Your detractors may blackmail you but your lord will surelly ‘whitemail you’.God is your strength
October 9, 2007 at 4:37 am |
Hi!
What do you think about love? >:)
November 4, 2007 at 7:40 pm |
Selen,
It is obvious that you haven’t had the opportunity to meet Adnan Oktar/Harun Yahya in person. I did meet him and unfortunately I did spend seven years of my early adulthood with him in his cult/group. And I would not wish the same experience I had to my worst enemy. He stole my and many other young people’s dreams, faith and innocence.
I personally do not care if he sends angelic messages to the world, he can do that to the last breath he takes. I personally know him, I know how damaging his cult is to the people around them.
Is it OK for you if a person disguises himself behind the facade of religion and take advantage of young minds and bodies?
Is it OK for a man to turn his disciples against his family?
Is it OK for a group of ideology followers to dress the same, talk the same, know only a close circle of other followers, to not have a family of their own or a significant other?
Is it OK for you that the followers strictly controlled by this group, and not have a life other than working for the cult/group, not have a savings account, not have a permission to go to the movies?
is it normal for you to see a group of people with no ties to their families, and living only with their friends……
Long story short,
This is a cult. The world is full of cults, my problem with this one is that they do immoral things while using religions as a guard themselves. Everything you hear about the scandalous sex life of the group is true, and you know what, I really don’t care about the seedy side of their life all that much. They’re simply adults and they can do whatever pleases them as long as they represent themselves as they are! My problem with all of it is that they use religion to get to young people and they are not telling the truth and when the truth is out they just don’t know how to cover it up. The only way to cover everything up is to attack our freedom of speech.
I am free and I am free to tell what happened to me. I am free to warn young people about them.
November 7, 2007 at 8:38 pm |
semsi02,
are you sure? or is it just another slander by you?
November 8, 2007 at 3:54 pm |
If he would be scientiest he would answer all questions about critic of his book. He never answers.. Its because of he only translate from Methodist Church Researchs to his books.. That all..
Check this page and see what he did SCIENTISTS who criticized his book..
http://whoisharunyahya.wordpress.com/scientists-is-charged-with-a-fine-in-turkey/
He didnt answer criticism.. He never talks face to face with scientist.. Have you ever seen Harun Yahya in a discussion as live?
NO YOUCAN NEVER SEE.. He only translates thats ALL
November 24, 2007 at 7:38 am |
Listen Lenteng,
I don’t slander at all. All I am doing is to inform people about the truth. I feel accountable for the inside knowledge I have about this group. I am telling my experience to inform people, it’s up to you to make up your mind.
Since you’re not Turkish (i’ assuming), you don’t have access to all of the information about this group. All you know is their story that’s told by themselves.
You can believe their books, read them or whatever….but do not think that this guy is the mehdi as he implies. People around him, not a lot of them but a few, have been with him since 1985, they’ve been waiting for the “Golden Age” to come, thinking that Adnan will rule the world. When I was with them the projected date was 1999, well… then I heard that it was postponed to 2005 and now there is a new date! In 15 to 20 years, mehdi will defeat the anti-christ and the golden age will begin. Hmmmmmm…
So my old fellows will be between 55 and 60 years old. I am sure they will patiently wait for the golden age. I do not have any respect for any of them anymore. They are only after that kind of reward.
So what will they lose?
They have already lost their youth, dreams, faith, family, friends, life, a prospective family of their own, a love life, a sincere and honest life. They will lose their parents, they are living a big lie. They’re made to believe that this world is not real and nothing we see is real. It is true but only for them. What they are in is a big lie, a big fairytale. They are just the extras for the big play by Adnan. They have already lost their own identities, they are just pawns and they are at disposal of Adnan. But sometimes I think they just deserve what they get, after seeing all this transformation of this big lie if they are still after the rewards they are going to reap, they deserve what they are exposed to.
December 10, 2007 at 11:25 pm |
If you are experiencing diffficulties accessing this please email me directly and I will send this to you.
Five Pillars of Democracy : How the West Can Promote
> > an Islamic Reformation
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > By Cheryl Benard is a senior political
> > scientist at RAND.Rival versions of Islam are
> > contending for spiritual and political dominance,
> > with immense implications for the rest of the world.
> > By understanding the ongoing ideological struggle
> > within Islam and by distinguishing among the
> > competing strains of Islamic thought, Western
> > leaders can identify appropriate Islamic partners
> > and work with them to discourage extremism and
> > violence as well as to encourage democratization and
> > development.The notion that the outside world should
> > try to nurture a moderate, democratic version of
> > Islam has been in circulation for decades but gained
> > great urgency after Sept. 11, 2001. There is broad
> > agreement that this is a constructive approach.
> > Islam inspires a variety of ideologies and political
> > actions, some of which are inimical to global
> > stability. It therefore seems sensible to foster the
> > strains within Islam that call for a more moderate,
> > democratic, peaceful, and tolerant social order.It
> > is no easy matter to transform a major world
> > religion. If “nation-building” is a daunting task,
> > “religionbuilding” is immeasurably more perilous and
> > complex. Islam is neither a homogeneous entity nor a
> > selfcontained system. Many extraneous issues and
> > problems have become entangled with the religion.
> > Many political actors in the Muslim world
> > deliberately seek to “Islamize” the debate in a way
> > that they think will further their goals.The current
> > crisis in Islam has two main components: a failure
> > to thrive on its own terms and a loss of connection
> > to the global mainstream. The Islamic world has been
> > marked by a long period of backwardness and
> > comparative powerlessness. Many homegrown
> > solutions—such as nationalism, pan-Arabism, Arab
> > socialism, and Islamic revolution—have been
> > attempted without success, leading to frustration
> > and anger. Meanwhile, the Islamic world has both
> > fallen out of step with contemporary global culture
> > and moved increasingly to the margins of the global
> > economy, creating an uncomfortable situation for
> > both sides.Muslims disagree on what to do about the
> > crisis, what has caused it, and what their societies
> > ultimately should look like. For the West, the
> > question is which ideology (or ideologies) to
> > support; with what methods; and with what concrete,
> > realistic goals in mind.An Ideological SpectrumThere
> > are essentially four ideological positions in the
> > Muslim world today: fundamentalist, traditionalist,
> > modernist, and secularist. Each group contains
> > subgroups that blur the distinctions among the
> > primary groups. It is important for Western leaders
> > to understand the differences within groups as well
> > as among groups.Fundamentalists reject democratic
> > values and contemporary Western culture. They want
> > an authoritarian, puritanical state to implement
> > their extreme view of Islamic law and morality. They
> > are willing to use innovation and modern technology.
> > They do not shy away from violence.There are two
> > strands of fundamentalism. One, grounded in theology
> > and usually rooted in a religious establishment,
> > belongs to the scriptural fundamentalists. This
> > group includes most of the Iranian revolutionaries,
> > the Saudi-based Wahhabis, and the Kaplan
> > congregation of Turks. The radical fundamentalists,
> > in contrast, are much less concerned with the
> > literal substance of Islam, with which they take
> > considerable liberties either deliberately or
> > because of ignorance of orthodox Islamic doctrine.
> > Al Qaeda, the Afghan Taliban, Hizb-ut-Tahrir, and a
> > large number of other Islamic radical movements and
> > diffuse
December 13, 2007 at 11:45 am |
I actually just read a little bit of the “Atlas of Creation.” Wow. There are over 20 chapters trying to disprove the theory of Evolution, stating there is no “scientific” evidence to back it up. Then there are 2 chapters trying to prove we were created, without any scientific evidence, basically stating “you just gotta have faith.”
This was my favorite excerpt that I caught, “Living things did not come into being through the imaginary processes of evolution. All the living things that have ever existed on Earth were created by God. This fact of creation is once again revealed in the traces left behind them by flawless living things.”
Logic just doesn’t seem to exist in creationism.
Posted by: marcusJones
February 8, 2008 at 10:22 am |
bilgisayarindaki tum bilgiler elimde
bittin sen assagilik herif
February 9, 2008 at 11:27 pm |
Adnan Hocanın Motoru musun sende Nevsal? Gel sen bana bak Adnan gibi iğrenç yağlı takıntılı bir adam haricinde farklı zevkleri tat…
Adnan sana ne verdi? Kokain mi? Bence kesinlikle seni düzmeden önce uyuşturmuştur bu herif.. Yoksa ondan zevk alman mümkün değil….
March 1, 2008 at 6:20 am |
adnana yapmayın etmeyin hastadır o!! (ben değil bunu annesi söylüyor!)
adnan is a sick person, literally. his mental sickness (schizophrenia) has been affirmed by several mental institutions.
where ADNAN belongs is the most CRIMINAL-PSYCHOTIC patients’ cell in asylum. nowhere else.
March 22, 2008 at 4:39 pm |
maybe you are a masonic sympathiser or a fan of the secular turkish govt.
harun yahya is doing a great service by opening people’s eyes. darwin himself warned against his theories being taken too seriously. mr. yahya is simply refuting somehting that was never meant to be establikshed as science.
it is fact that evolution of man from apes has collapsed. scientists mistakenly gathered bones of different sewpcies of primates throughout the prehistoric eras and thought they were actually the same thing.
lets not forget certain things………. fossil andbones of man has been found in africa as old as the first monkey bones. ever heard of the place called zinj? its modern day ethiopia and somalia …. and the earliest form of man fossil was found there. it was about the same timeo r earlier during the supposed first stage of human evolution. its found that man wore clothes and walked upright and were tall. so there goes ur beloved theory.
the peking man was a hoax which people such as urself relish in using as an argument agaiunst religion. the guy himself said he made the peking man up. so there is no missing link.
besides, people that study the dna say that it would take several accidents (timed deliberate accidents) throughout a loong period of time for monkey to be man. even then its doubtful if it would be truly that.
so yeah i would listen to adnan okhtar or harun yahya before i start cheerleading for that pig headed turkish govt of kous kous eaters.
salaam.
October 4, 2008 at 6:58 am |
Adnan Oktar dusmanligina soyunmuslarin hepsi KAFIRDIR.
Bitti.
October 4, 2008 at 7:00 am |
Mr Harun Yahya is great writer.
October 6, 2008 at 10:19 am |
I guess Semsi02 is right. Look what I found:
“He stole our children’s soul”
The mothers of the followers’ of Adnan Hodja have rebelled with a petition: “this man stole our children’s soul through hypnosis.”
“He brainwashed our children. Their eyes are expressionless, like robots. As Adnan Hodja stole their souls via hypnosis, what they say comes from his mouth. He made our children into slaves using religion.”
http://english.sabah.com.tr/2007/03/15/im/A05DA2BCC0B44A42ABCEE27Ab.jpg
The mothers of Hüma Babuna, Eda Babuna, Ceyda Ertüzün, Sinem Tezyapar and Ebru Akyüzalp have claimed that their children are acting under the influence of Adnan Hodja and they have submitted a crime report about Adnan Oktar and his children. The mothers of the followers’ of Adnan Hodja are rebelling with a petition that states: “this man stole our children’s soul via hypnosis.” They are demanding Oktar be tried for soliciting slander. Lütfiye Semin Babuna stated that she does not know where her daughter is living and what she is doing, and stated in the petition form: “He brainwashed our children. Their eyes are expressionless like robots. As Adnan Hodja stole their souls via hypnosis, what they say comes from his mouth. He has turned our children into slaves using religion.”
Source: Sabah online, April 2007
December 12, 2008 at 5:34 pm |
sayin site yoneticisi;yukarida benim adimla yazilmis olan yorumu bir arkadasimin farketmesi uzerine okudum.Harun yahya soytarisina hicbir sempati duymamakla birlikte boylesine cocukca bir tehdit savuracak kadar da cahil bir insan degilim.Bir donem aktif uyesi oldugum forumdan adimi bilen bir muslonun adimi kullandigini tahmin ediyorum.O mesaji ya da adimi silerseniz cok memnun olurum.Tesekkurer
January 16, 2009 at 6:08 am |
Harun Yahya is a complete fraud. I’ve been looking at his book, “Skulls That Demolish Darwin,” and it is obvious that the so called fossils he uses as examples are not genuine. Every example is the same chalky white colour with the appearance of a modern, unfossilised specimen that has been stuffed with clay. He purports to show that skulls of modern animals have not changed for millions of years but the dates he claims for his fraudulent skulls are ridiculous, like for example, a Giraffe skull that he says is from the Cretaceous age, 65 million years ago. A simple Google search will show anyone that Giraffes originated from animals that lived about 30 – 50 million years ago, and the modern, long necked Giraffe, about one million.
In my humble opinion, anyone with a modicum of intelligence or self respect shoud regard this criminal cretinous charlatan with the contempt that he deserves
April 13, 2009 at 3:22 pm |
http://www.psychologicalwarfaremethods.com
April 13, 2009 at 3:23 pm |
please visit http://www.psychologicalwarfaremethods.com
April 13, 2009 at 3:23 pm |
visit http://www.psychologicalwarfaremethods.com
April 13, 2009 at 3:23 pm |
heeeeeeeeee http://www.psychologicalwarfaremethods.com
April 28, 2009 at 4:45 am |
please visit http://psychologicalwarfaremethods.com/
July 6, 2009 at 9:21 am |
Why does Adnan Oktar not publish his books under his own name? Richard Dawkins doesn’t use a pseudonym. I can only assume that Oktar is scared of using his real name, as the scandal of his actions will show that his ideas come from a morally suspect person.
July 6, 2009 at 9:27 am |
JAMSHED MOIDU writes:
” http://www.psychologicalwarfaremethods.com”
It really doesn’t matter how much you try to excuse your master’s criminal deeds. Oktar is in prison now.
By the way Jamshed why hide behind a pseudonym? Your real name is Jamshed Kunnoth. Are you scared of something? Remember Richard Dawkins does not use a pseudonym for his writing, so that makes him braver than you or your criminal cult leader.