it can be concluded that:
The distance reached by The affairs in a day
is equal to
The distance reached by the moon in 1000 years or 12000 months
]

So heaven = moon ?? Hmmm.. why not if the alleged author was the moon god (and didnt have access to stars beyond the moon)

OK Joe Morreale and Jamshed moidu. Did you get that? you are pandering to a false prophet that is a crimnal. Why not stop your idolatry and actually read the scientific evidence for evolution. Or is your false prophet the only person that you listen to?

THE SPEED OF ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE
THE HIGHEST SPEED IN THE UNIVERSE
That is 299792.5 km/sec
Can be determined / calculated exactly based on
The information taken from an old document

“He directs the affairs from the heavens to the earth: then it ascends unto Him, on a Day the measure of which is a thousand years of your reckoning” (32:5)

it can be concluded that:
The distance reached by The affairs in a day
is equal to
The distance reached by the moon in 1000 years or 12000 months
C . t = 12000 . L
where : C = the speed of the Affairs
t = time in a day
L = the route length of the moon’s trip in one month

Based on Sidereal System, ( relative motion of the moon’s and the sun to the star in universe )
1 day = 23 hours 56 minutes 4.0906 seconds
= 86164.0906 seconds
1 month = 27.321661 days

Then consider the moon’s route during one sidereal month
The route is not of a circle like you possibly imagine
But in the form of a curvature with a length of L = v . T
where:
v = the speed of the moon
T = moon revolution period
= 27.321661 days

alfa = angle formed by earth’s revolution during one sidereal month
alfa = (27.321661 days/365.25636 days) * 360 degree = 26.92848 degree

Relative speed to earth which can be calculated with
the following formula:
ve = 2 . pi . R / T

Where R = radius of moon revolution = 384264 km
T = the period of moon’s revolution = 655.71986 hours

Hence ve = 2 * 3.14162 * 384264 km / 655.71986 hrs
= 3682.07 km/hr

Relative speed to star or universe. This is what we need
v = Ve * Cos (alfa)

Hence:
C . t = 12000 . L
C . t = 12000 . v . T
C . t = 12000 . ( ve . Cos (alfa) ) . T

C = 12000 . ve . Cos (alfa) . T / t
C = 12000 * 3682.07 km/hr * 0.89157 * 655.71986 hrs / 86164.0906 sec
C = 299792.5 km/sec

US National Bureau of Standards
C = 299792.4574 + 0.0011 km/sec
The British National Physical Laboratory
C = 299792.4590 + 0.0008 km/sec

The conclusion
“This calculation proved the accuracy and consistency of the constant C resulted from measurement and also shows the truth of the Holy Qur’an as revelation which is proper to be studied with a sharp analysis for the Writer is the Creator of the universe”

Today the Biotechnology has being advanced better then the past years ago, that we human might also manipulate DNA. Wouldn’t prehistoric human can be manipulated in DNA too?
Could we manipulate gorila or chimpanzee into some kind prehistoric human creature in the next years?

“That is due to the fact that according to the theory of evolution, which Dawkins supports, the existence of life is based on entirely random coincidences.”

No evolutionary biologist has ever claimed that the evolution of life is entirely random. On the contrary, the brilliance of Darwin was that he could see how the NON-RANDOM PROCESS OF NATURAL SELECTION could explain the diversity of life.

“Dawkins has realized that he can get nowhere with the scenario of chance. But, he is now in the logical impasse as he basically claims that “evolution cannot be a result of coincidences, but has occurred by means of coincidences.” What he should realize is that demagogy no longer works.”

The quote is, of course, taken out of context. The full quote would reveal that what Dawkins is talking about is that random mutations are what fuels Natural Selection. That is, Natural Selection needs diversity to work with. Mutations provide that. Basic stuff.

“Let us send the first 4 volumes of Atlas of Creation to Mr. Dawkins, and let him examine the photographs of the fossils therein which have not changed at all over the hundreds of millions of years.”

Dawkins has already addressed the Atlas of LIES and torn it to pieces. I especially liked that picture of a supposed modern fly, complete with hook and all. Oktar has no credibility.

“Archeological researches unearthed over a hundred million fossils, proving that life forms were created out of nothing. Still, there is not a single transitional fossil supporting the theory of evolution. If Dawkins is sincere in his claim, he should bring a transitional fossil and announce it to the public as “a transitional form!””

At least read the blog you’ve responded to, you fucking moron.

“In mathematics, probabilities smaller than 1 over 1050 are accepted as “zero probability.””

This is just plain stupid. Whether you accept a very small number as ~zero very much depends on what you are dealing with. Depending on the context 1 over 1050 could result in a large probability of something occurring.

“Darwinism, tried to be kept alive by engaging in demagogy and propaganda, has been refuted in all spheres”

Except for all those spheres that actually belong to science.

“HARUN YAHYA HAS REFUTED EVOLUTION”

The only thing Oktar has managed to do is to humiliate himself in public.

WE CHALLENGE DAWKINS TO A DISCUSSION BEFORE THE PUBLIC

Richard Dawkins, a most ardent supporter of Darwinism, has long accounted for the perfect creation of the universe in terms of the theory of evolution, which has lately suffered a global collapse. In his recent writings and interviews, however, Dawkins has started to express that “life cannot form by chance.” It is an absence of sense and reason to support evolution on one hand and to state that life cannot come about by chance on the other. That is due to the fact that according to the theory of evolution, which Dawkins supports, the existence of life is based on entirely random coincidences.

Dawkins has realized that he can get nowhere with the scenario of chance. But, he is now in the logical impasse as he basically claims that “evolution cannot be a result of coincidences, but has occurred by means of coincidences.” What he should realize is that demagogy no longer works.

If Dawkins sincerely believes in this theory, we’d like to invite him to Turkey, or else we could come to UK to have a discussion. Dawkins should clarify hundreds of questions, only a few of which are listed below, before the cameras. So we, as well as the public, will be able to hear what he has to say. Obviously, it’s no good to engage in unilateral programs. Moreover, with such an attitude Dawkins only deceives himself. Let us send the first 4 volumes of Atlas of Creation to Mr. Dawkins, and let him examine the photographs of the fossils therein which have not changed at all over the hundreds of millions of years. And let him account for them in evolutionary terms according to his much-publicized logic�quot;if he can!

Archeological researches unearthed over a hundred million fossils, proving that life forms were created out of nothing. Still, there is not a single transitional fossil supporting the theory of evolution. If Dawkins is sincere in his claim, he should bring a transitional fossil and announce it to the public as “a transitional form!”
The odds against a functional protein emerging randomly is 10950 to 1�quot;a practical impossibility. (In mathematics, probabilities smaller than 1 over 1050 are accepted as “zero probability.”) If Dawkins is honest, he should point at a mass of proteins that formed by chance or by means of the methods he espouses. Let Dawkins explain us how he can account for the origin of life in evolutionary terms, when even a single protein�quot;the building block of life�quot;cannot form by chance!
Let Dawkins explain us how all colorful, lively, three-dimensional and perfectly clear images, shortly life itself, can form in the pitch dark human brain and who sees this image in the brain!
Let Dawkins explain us in evolutionary terms how conversations, music and all other sounds form in the sound-isolated brain; who listens to and enjoys these sounds, who knows their meaning, who reflects on them consciously and who answers back these sounds!
Let Dawkins ask the same questions to us, and let us give our answers. Let us supply our evidence, and let him bring his�quot;if he has any. Then let the public decide who is right. We want the public to know on a larger scale how Darwinism is a false theory and how it is the greatest deception of the world’s history. We are confident that the days are soon to come when people will laugh, asking themselves “How could we ever believe this theory?” In near future, people will be wondering with amazement how they could ever have been taken in by it. In fact, this is already occurring, at an ever-increasing momentum. World-wide polls reveal statistical data proving this state of affairs.

Darwinism, tried to be kept alive by engaging in demagogy and propaganda, has been refuted in all spheres and it is now widely recognized that it’s no longer possible to defend Darwinism by demagogy. Dawkins’ recent statement along the logic that “evolution cannot be a result of coincidences, but has occurred by means of coincidences” is nothing but a laughable misery of reason.

HARUN YAHYA HAS REFUTED EVOLUTION AND IT IS TIME TO HUMILIATE IN PUBLIC THAT MUPPET DAWKINS WHO HAS ALWAYS BEEN HIDING BEHIND THE SECULAR ESTABLISHMENT.

WE ARE WAITING…